On Thu, 5 Nov 2020, RW wrote:
On Wed, 04 Nov 2020 18:48:48 -0500
Bill Cole wrote:
On 4 Nov 2020, at 13:31, Thomas Anderson wrote:
* 1.8 MISSING_MIMEOLE Message has X-MSMail-Priority, but
no X-MimeOLE
In addition to what John noted, that one looks like a candidate for
constructing an exception. MISSING_MIMEOLE already has a number of
exceptions based on the fact that other MUAs have adopted
X-MSMail-Priority but have no reason to use X-MimeOLE because it's a
fundamentally bad idea as a header with no real utility. With a
sample of the headers for the message that hit that rule, we could
add an exception for whatever is generating such messages in this
case.
it was sent via t-online.de see:
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7306
t-online.de obviously haven't changed their client in the last four years,
so perhaps we should reopen that bug and add the exception.
AXB - any comments??
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 days until The 82nd anniversary of Kristallnacht - disarmament enables
genocide
