On 2020-11-18 1:45 pm, RW wrote: 

> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:44:21 -0500
> Dean Carpenter wrote:
> 0.0 NO_DNS_FOR_FROM DNS: ENVELOPE SENDER HAS NO MX OR A DNS RECORDS -0.5 
> FROM_IS_REPLY_TO From and REPPLY-TO is the same 0.0 SPF_NONE SPF: SENDER DOES 
> NOT PUBLISH AN SPF RECORD

> Heh, the FROM_IS_REPLY_TO description has a slight typo ...

FROM_IS_REPLY_TO is neither a standard rule nor a KAM rule. 

Also the descriptions for a couple of the rules have been converted to
upper case.

Ah, I totally forgot I pulled in the eXtremeshok rules to play with. 

Hrm - test system status email 

> /etc/cron.daily/spamassassin:
> Nov 19 06:30:11.784 [312057] info: rules: meta test KAM_NOTIFY2 has 
> dependency 'KAM_IFRAME' with a zero score
> Nov 19 06:30:11.785 [312057] info: rules: meta test JMQ_CONGRAT has 
> dependency 'KAM_RAPTOR_ALTERED' with a zero score
> Nov 19 06:30:11.790 [312057] info: rules: meta test KAM_BADPDF2 has 
> dependency 'KAM_RPTR_SUSPECT' with a zero score
> Nov 19 06:30:11.794 [312057] info: rules: meta test KAM_CARD has dependency 
> 'KAM_RPTR_SUSPECT' with a zero score
> Nov 19 06:30:11.797 [312057] info: rules: meta test KAM_REALLY_FAKE_DELIVER 
> has dependency 'KAM_RPTR_PASSED' with a zero score
> Nov 19 06:30:11.801 [312057] info: rules: meta test KAM_JURY has dependency 
> 'KAM_RAPTOR_ALTERED' with a zero score
> Nov 19 06:30:11.802 [312057] info: rules: meta test KAM_FAKE_DELIVER has 
> dependency 'KAM_RAPTOR_ALTERED' with a zero score

 

Reply via email to