On 21-01-31 12:58:48, Axb wrote:
Cisco forgot to renew spamcop.net
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-01-30T05:00:00Z
On 31.01.21 12:02, Georg Faerber wrote:
That's still one year to go, isn't it?
Den 31-01-2021 kl. 15:35 skrev Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
seems that this has been overtaken by someone who provides false
positives
for anyhing:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
1.0.0.127.bl.spamcop.net. 1800 IN A 91.195.240.87
On 31.01.21 16:30, Arne Jensen wrote:
If this one causes false positives for anyone, then that actual
person/organisation (obviously, MX operator side) that it causes false
positives for, are the one to blame.
Spamcop hasn't ever listed "91.195.240.87" a valid return code, have they?
...even spamcop's howto doesn't describe using the code:
https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/349.html
->
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/291.html
The response code from the SpamCop server to indicate a queried IP is
listed is 127.0.0.2
If everyone had done proper return code checking, e.g. response =
127.0.0.2, and not been triggering on anything else, then everyone's
mail systems would have kept running just fine, without any issues, at all.
After all, any false positives are solely done by the lack of proper
validation of return codes on the receiving end.
Note that the spamcop.net domain simply hasn't been renewed! It hasn't
*YET* been "overtaken by someone", as you say.
it has been overtaken by registrar and provided with fake data.
(I wouldn't expect this from serious registrar)
however, problem seems to be fixed:
www.spamcop.net. 300 IN CNAME spamcop.net.edgekey.net.
spamcop.net.edgekey.net. 300 IN CNAME e8912.dscg.akamaiedge.net.
e8912.dscg.akamaiedge.net. 20 IN A 92.123.24.114
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot.
