On 31 Jan 2021, at 10:04, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 31.01.21 15:43, Axb wrote:
On 1/31/21 3:35 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 31.01.21 12:02, Georg Faerber wrote:
On 21-01-31 12:58:48, Axb wrote:
Cisco forgot to renew spamcop.net
Registry Expiry Date: 2022-01-30T05:00:00Z
That's still one year to go, isn't it?
seems that this has been overtaken by someone who provides false
positives
for anyhing:
;; ANSWER SECTION:
1.0.0.127.bl.spamcop.net. 1800 IN A
91.195.240.87
It's parked & wildcarded. Sedo_typical
looks like answer 91.195.240.87 should be treated as NXDOMAIN
Only a carelessly misconfigured system will treat "any A record" as an
active DNSBL listing. We are almost 2 decades past the first time a
DNSBL had this problem and responsibly developed tools (like SA) avoid
it by default.
In the case of SpamCop and SA, the default RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET rule
will only match if there's a TXT record with 'spamcop' in its content.
Other DNSBL rules in SA require hitting specific 127.* values in A
records.
--
Bill Cole
b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
(AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
Not Currently Available For Hire
