Alan <spamassassin.tw...@ambitonline.com> writes:

> It's sent to the bit bucket, not done in the MTA. In this case, each
> account can set individual thresholds and has an individual set of
> local rules, so that might be why. I'd prefer to 550 them as well,
> although I suspect the majority of sources just don't care. Lately the
> most insidious stuff has been coming from VPS providers with
> insufficient vetting.

For actual spam, it doesn't matter if you /dev/null or 550 them.

My point -- to the list, not really so much to you since I realize you
have your own reasons --  was that there is a possibility of a legit
sender's message hitting the threshold, and for that message, it is much
better to 550 than /dev/null so they can figure it out.   It's only for
that very rare legit mail that it matters, in my view, but there it's
important.


Thus, I have a setup to MTA-reject at 8 and everything that makes it
through that gets filed, in INBOX if low enough, and  in a spam folder
if not.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to