Matija Nalis <mnalis-sa-l...@voyager.hr> writes: > From > https://knowledge.validity.com/s/articles/Accessing-Validity-reputation-data-through-DNS > : > >> Starting March 1, 2024, Validity will allow up to 10,000 requests to >> anonymous users over a 30-day period. > > 10k requests per 30-day period is about 333 queries/day. Or less than 14 > queries per hour. > Not very much at all (and certainly at least order of magnitude less than > your stated traffic). > No amount of local DNS caching is going to fix limits *that low*.
That is remarkably low. A quick check for me shows just over 10K messages processed by SA. I didn't However a bunch of them hit shortcircuit rules (e.g. DKIM welcomelist) and thus I suspect some of those don't query RBLs (but logs show some do). So perhaps I am just squeaking by. And yes, I am running my own resolver. This is a personal server. While I can see that some personal servers would be under a 10k/30d limit, this is quite different from a 50k or 100k limit and I'd expect many even single-person servers to get blocked. Has SA doctrine changed in terms of default ruleset inclusion of RBLs that block small sites with properly-configured resolvers? I managed to miss the new feature of detecting blockage and disabling that RBL, and I can see that with that feature, having default rules that are blocked for many reasonable personal use systems is less problematic.
