Well, it's not ok to send html mail at all. But I just got a non-spam,
actual messages from a human, that other than being html, was not at all
spammy. The HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE rule fired.
The LARGE and HUGE rule is:
body HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE eval:html_range('max_size', '5', '6')
describe HTML_FONT_SIZE_LARGE HTML font size is large
body HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE eval:html_range('max_size', '6', 'inf')
describe HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE HTML font size is huge
I can't post the whole message, but there is
<div dir=3D"ltr" style=3D"font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-s=
ystem, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0,=
0, 0);">
and that's 12 point type, which is hard to say how that appears on
screen, but in my book that's generous/reasonable but not large on paper,
while 10 pt is starting to be too small to read comfortably. So I would
not flag this size as being at all unreasonable.
The rules seem to be perhaps written for some concept of font size where
0 is normal and then each increment is some step, which dimly reminds me
of that being an MS bug.
The sizes in the message are all 12pt, except that the div for my quoted
text is 11pt.
<div class=3D"PlainText" style=3D"font-size: 11pt;">
Do other people see HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE on messages where it doesn't
seem to fit?
