Matija Nalis <[email protected]> writes:
> The HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE is NOT triggering on my SA 3.4.1 with your
> ham.000 (only HTML_MESSAGE and DMARC/etc stuff is).
3.4.1 is old and you are overdue for upgrade, but I can tell you know
that; mentioning it for other readers.
> I know this might sound annoying (that is not my intention!); but are you
> sure that:
It's fair; I ask the same sorts of questions.
> - this is really the exact file you've checking with "spamassassin -D -t" ?
Really sure. The SPF stuff showed up as I was editing and rerunning. I
can see the input file in the output.
> - that something in your extra rules did not override HTML_FONT_SIZE_HUGE
> test?
grepping local.cf I find nothing. So I'm as sure as I can be.
> Well, maybe someone with SA 4.0.2 can check how it behaves for them;
> maybe it's a bug there (maybe only on NetBSD?)
>
> If I were you, I'd:
>
> - wait a little if someone can reproduce the issue with SA 4.0.2
This has happened already, on Ubuntu 26.04. Thanks Andrew!
> - however if bug is successfully reproduced in pristine NetBSD
> Spamassassin 4.0.2, I'd fire up my editor and start adding dbg()
> statements in that Mail/SpamAssassin/HTML.pm in anything
> mentioning "size" (i.e. sub text_style() primarily) until I found
> out what exactly is changing those $self->{max_size} and/or
> $self->{min_size})
I think we have arrrived here, except it's not related to NetBSD. And,
so far we have zero reports of failure to repo with SA 4.0.2 on any
platform :-)
It could be related to perl 5.42.0 (just making that up).
Your perl debugging advice appears sound. Thanks for taking the time to
read and respond.
