>>>[all snipped]
>> keystreams. com "seems" to be a legitimate hosting company; Which
>>is not to say that they are or are not "spam friendly" and/or have some
>>customers who are "bad actors". They do have a five year history and seem
>>to themselves have been clean (unclear how many domains they own or operate,
>>or if any of them have a "bad" history).
>>
>> Paul Shupak
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>Why are we discussing the legitimacy of keystreams.com when the spam
>sample I sent in was sent *to* keystreams.com. FYI, we've actually been
>around since April of 1999 previously known as Realshell.com.
>
>--
>Roman Volf
>Keystreams Internet Solutions
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Roman,
Sorry about any implication that you or keystreams wasn't clean.
I must have just glazed over your post and responded to Jeff's, saying
that, indeed, you seemed "clean". Jeff's own later message (I read it
after responding), pointed out exactly as you said, that keystreams was
the "victim", not a "perpetrator".
Sorry; I just immediately jump to "check mode" for some posts, and
you looked immediately clean - and I meant to respond in that way, but not
offend anyone who might have said differently. Obviously, I chose the wrong
side to try not to upset.
Again, I apologize for any implied offense - none was intended. (When
I mean to say bad things, I think that the archives will show I do not often
"mince" my words.) I only meant to point out I didn't do a "thorough" check
because none seemed to be necessary (i.e. keystreams immediately looked to be
an upright and legitimate company).
Sincerely,
Paul Shupak
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
