> Did Aecio confirm that Kai? > > AFAIK Aecio claims to be posting from a static IP. It's on DSL, but that > doesn't > make it dynamic (think business class DSL lines).
Yes, perfect! > However, Since the Brazilian Telecom that owns the IP block mixes and matches > dynamic and static IP's at random, there's little to be done but treat the > whole > pool as dynamic. It's not like anyone (including SORBS) can have a ip-by-ip > list of which ones are dynamic and static if the ISP is literally setting it > up > completely at random. Also, correct. > I know that listing it all sucks, but there's very little that the rest of the > world can do about the stupidity of the telco. Quite frankly, I feel that > "Comite Gestor da Internet no Brasil" really isn't up to the task of being an > ISP at all. Their general lack of response to abuse complaints, or even their > own customer complaints is good evidence of that. And yes, I also know there's > no real other choice in brazil, but that doesn't make the problem any less > real > (for people on both sides). Comite gestor da Internet no Brasil = Brazil Internet Management Comitee. They have no guilty on this matter. The problem is with Telefónica, which is the carrier of ADSL in my city. And I bet they would even (try to) understand what this matter means... > If that telco wants to offer business-class static DSL lines, they should be > in > a separate CIDR block from the dynamic residential accounts. They treat all as dsl and period. I am not a Telefónica fan, but I also had noticed that worldwide dsl addresses are being incorrectly related as dynamic - like SORBS does. If they would really provide quality, they would know that my IP is not dynamic instead of listing a whole range. This is stupid and dsl address is not synonimous of dynamic. At least, I am glad to know that Matt could understand my pain with an open mind.
