In an older episode (Friday, 12. August 2005 01:46), Dallas L. Engelken wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: wolfgang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 6:36 PM > > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Phishing IP listed in URIBL and SURBL, but not > > triggering URI rules > > > > In an older episode (Friday, 12. August 2005 01:18), Dallas > > L. Engelken wrote: > > > > > Looks like we agree with surbl.. > > > > > > # host -tTXT 158.194.144.219.multi.uribl.com > > > 158.194.144.219.multi.uribl.com descriptive text "Listed on > > [black] - > > > See http://lookup.uribl.com/?domain=158.194.144.219"; > > > > Yes, but - as Dirk pointed out - that does *not* result in SA > > recognizing > > 219.194.144.158 as listed - only the surbl lookup cgi handles > > that "reversed dotted decimal" as a signal that > > 219.194.144.158 is listed. In other words, that entry is > > useless for SA. Correct me if I am wrong here. > > > > Hrmmm?? What version are you running? Mine gets it right.
3.0.4-2 - the version that debian linux currently provides - and the current official SA release AFAIK. > I know <snip> > gets it right, as does SA 3.1.x of which has been > getting it right since very early in the 3.1.0 trunk. SA' s official release isn't "bleeding edge" enuf then, apparently. Thanks for the clarification. cheers, wolfgang
