I don't remember seeing any subsequent messages on the subject. And,
over on the mimedefang list the developer worked out a work-around in
mimedefang, but it still sounded like it was an SA problem.
On Aug 30, 2005, at 1:13 AM, jdow wrote:
As I remember subsequent messages on this topic a debug run showed the
problem was in MimeDefang. So of course it is not fixed.
{^_^}
----- Original Message ----- From: "John Rudd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Aug 29, 2005, at 9:29 PM, Duncan Findlay wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 08:57:31PM -0700, John Rudd wrote:
Does this fix the problem with SIGCHLD?
Do you have a bug number? What problem with SIGCHLD are you talking
about?
I do not have a bug number. It's a problem I mentioned on the list
just two days ago:
From: John Rudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
This is a problem that some mimedefang people are experiencing with
SA 3.1 rc1.
(mimedefang slave processes are becoming un-killable due to a
mis-feature in SA 3.1 which messes with SIGCHLD)
