mouss wrote: > Matt Kettler a écrit : > >> >> >> Ron, I understood you. What I don't understand is if that's what mouss is >> suggesting. >> >> As previously said, I read mouss as suggesting I empty antidrug.cf. I >> did not >> read you as suggesting this. > > > I didn't say so but had in mind: > - antidrug.cf: just a notice (which also provides a link to the pre30 > version) > - a pre30 version.
No way. That creates a problem for users of SA 2.64 who are RDJ'ing antidrug. They'd have to actively notice that the rules are gone and re-configure their systems. I definitely don't want to break functionality of users who are doing the right thing. On the other hand, I'd be perfectly happy to cause errors/warnings for users of SA 3.0.0 or higher, as they're the ones using an outdated ruleset.
