Hello Chris, Tuesday, January 10, 2006, 7:50:45 AM, you wrote:
CS> This is going to sound like tooting our own horn, but so be CS> it. Before SARE, Bayes was cool. After SARE, I see no need. Sorry Chris, as one Ninja to another, Bayes is your (well, my) friend. I'll agree that with SA and network tests and SARE, we hit 98%. With Bayes added to the mix we get 99.5%. 1.5% of 300,000 emails a week = an additional 4500 spam identified. Bob Menschel
