| > TOP HAM RULES FIRED | > ------------------------------------------------------------ | > RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM | > %OFHAM | > ------------------------------------------------------------ | > 1 DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE 88943 13.50 15.85 12.68 | > 25.27 | | That worries me. Granted, at most that will add 0.479 to a message (when | used with the default 3.1.1 scores), but to have your #1 *ham* rule be one | that's supposed to identify *spam* doesn't speak well for the rule. I like | RFCI; I feed it bogusmx or DSN-violating mail whenever I can. But, the abuse | and postmaster lists contain far too many *major* ISPs for them to be | reliable indicators of spam.
I can't tell you how surprised I was to see this as well. It's truly a bummer. QQQQ
