jdow wrote:
> From: "Bowie Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > qqqq wrote:
> > > > > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES
> > > > > %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > 1 URIBL_BLACK 163397 7.09
> > > > > 29.11 78.05 0.50
> > > >
> > > > Nice.
> > > >
> > > > How does that Queen song go?? We... are... ;)
> > >
> > > LOL! Congrats!
> >
> > I'll second that! I think the network tests are taking over...
> >
> > TOP SPAM RULES FIRED
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > RANK RULE NAME COUNT %OFRULES %OFMAIL %OFSPAM %OFHAM
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> > 6 BAYES_99 26754 4.19 44.49 67.00 3.06
>
> Holy spoo! Bayes can do MUCH better than that!
> {O.O}
I'm sure it can, but I've got per-user Bayes and most of my users
don't bother to train it.
--
Bowie
