Bart Schaefer wrote:
On 6/29/06, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bart Schaefer wrote:
>
> Under what circumstances would one list something as internal but not
> trusted?
NEVER. Newer versions of SA won't even allow you to make that
misconfiguration.
Ah, good. That's as I expected. (So why doesn't SA simply always
merge internal_networks into trusted_networks? It seems a waste of
effort to have to manually list the internal_networks in both places.)
It'd make inclusion/exclusion syntax impossible.
Daryl
