On Tue, Aug 01, 2006 at 04:33:39PM -0500, Logan Shaw wrote:
> However, don't assume that it kills the benefit of greylisting
> completely:  if you can delay processing that questionable
> message for 30 minutes or an hour, that greatly increases the
> chances it will end up on a realtime blacklist of some type.

Except now you've also delayed your valid mail by 30 minutes or an hour
which sucks (and is sometimes completely unacceptable).

> Then the spammer goes for a second pass through the list to
> try to defeat greylisting.  The servers that had greylisted
> the messages will receive it again but will check the
> distributed database.  The distributed database will have a
> zillion reports of suspicious activity from that IP address.
> That won't absolutely indicate that the message is spam,
> but it might be worth adding a score of 1 or 2 points.

Or it's the first time the service sees <insert legit newsletter sender>
sending out their newsletters. ;)

-- 
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"It's stupid to slap a table ... "          - Prof. Long

Attachment: pgp8HuXONqpSb.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to