On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 13:29 -0700, Gary Funck wrote:
> Two graphic-laden spams came in this AM that missed being scored
> high enough to be detected as spam:
> http://intrepid.com/~gary/spam-gif-1.txt
> http://intrepid.com/~gary/spam-gif-2.txt
> The first is just shy of the 5.0 threshold, but the second misses
> by a full point.
>
> Am wondering how these fare on others' set up, and what you've
> done so that these messages are detected as spam?
>
>
>
> configuration:
> SA 3.1.4
> gocr 0.40
> perl-Image-ExifTool 6.00
> MIMEdefang 2.56
> OCR plugin per Davin's 2006-08-02 message
>
> (note didn't applied patches to gocr or perl-Image-Exiftool, nor
> verified if the versions above already have the fixes.)
I don't have the OCR plugin installed, but am using the recently
posted ImageInfo plugin. This is what I get on spam-gif-1.txt:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=20.6 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_99,DC_GIF_MULTI_LARGO,EXTRA_MPART_TYPE,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,
HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_32,HTML_MESSAGE,J_CHICKENPOX_27,J_CHICKENPOX_44,
J_CHICKENPOX_72,SARE_GIF_ATTACH,TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_ID1,
TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_LONG,TVD_FW_GRAPHIC_NAME_MID
autolearn=no version=3.1.2
-Bill
