From: "Bjorn Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Can spamassassin benefit in any way from a ramdisk ?The server we have for spamassassin, has 3 gigs of ram, and spamd doesn't even use 1 gig of that, so I thought perhaps it would speed things up if I could place something on a ramdisk. But this leads to the question, does spamassassin do any disk intensive things ? I'm running that gocr image scanning as well, could this benefit from it, or is it the network lookups that are the slow part in any case ?Currently a mail is processed in about 1.5 - 6 seconds
Ramdisk is no different than keeping it daemonized in ram except that you'd still have to go through the spamassassin perl load. That is why spamc/spamd exist.
-- A: Because it messes up the order Observation. Side posting has in which people normally read text. the best chance of preserving Q: Why is it such a bad thing? context, doesn't it? A: Top-posting
{^,-}
