Giampaolo Tomassoni writes: > > CAVEAT: just because the client is listed on sbl-xbl does not mean the > > message is spam. In particular: > > - a legit user may be sending through a listed server. > > - a spammer may "corpus-corrupt" you by sending ham messages (slightly > > modified copies from mailing lists) > > I too like a lot SA score system: it want not allow a too radical point of > view on spam to create troubles to my customers. > > Justin, if you are concerned with CPU issues, why don't you adopt greylisting > instead of shutting the door to possible ham? It gets the very same results > in CPU relief, but it allows well-configured smtpd servers (possibly > ligitimate ones) to submit their messages to SA for a more precise evaluation.
Greylisting means I'd miss spam, since it wouldn't retry. The entire point of this is to *capture* the spam... --j.
