> Giampaolo Tomassoni writes: > > > CAVEAT: just because the client is listed on sbl-xbl does not > mean the > > > message is spam. In particular: > > > - a legit user may be sending through a listed server. > > > - a spammer may "corpus-corrupt" you by sending ham messages > (slightly > > > modified copies from mailing lists) > > > > I too like a lot SA score system: it want not allow a too > radical point of view on spam to create troubles to my customers. > > > > Justin, if you are concerned with CPU issues, why don't you > adopt greylisting instead of shutting the door to possible ham? > It gets the very same results in CPU relief, but it allows > well-configured smtpd servers (possibly ligitimate ones) to > submit their messages to SA for a more precise evaluation. > > Greylisting means I'd miss spam, since it wouldn't retry. The entire > point of this is to *capture* the spam...
Ahahah. It seems I was a bit too fast in repling, isn't it? :) Sorry for bothering you all, giampaolo > > --j.
