Michael W Cocke wrote:
I started out using amavisd-new then switched to MailScanner as my
mail tester 'framework' (SpamAssassin has been a constant)
Looking thru the docs of Mailscanner, it doesn't come out and SAY that
it just does the 'basic' spam test features, but reading between the
lines it seems to - I have a feeling that amavisd worked better, but
that's completely subjective... Does anyone have an opinion?
Mike-
--
If you're not confused, you're not trying hard enough.
--
Please note - Due to the intense volume of spam, we have installed
site-wide spam filters at catherders.com. If email from you bounces,
try non-HTML, non-encoded, non-attachments,
Depends on how you've configured MailScanner..it does alot of other
tests (phishing detection, filename based tests, looking inside zip.gzip
archives for bad content etc).
As to why you get more spam in your inbox than with amavisd-new theres
alot more around recently and how many third party rules have you
installed???
--
Martin Hepworth
Senior Systems Administrator
Solid State Logic
Tel: +44 (0)1865 842300
**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they
are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify
the system manager.
This footnote confirms that this email message has been swept
for the presence of computer viruses and is believed to be clean.
**********************************************************************
