Re: Rule update over DNS?

[Jim Maul]

Justin Mason wrote:
Jim Maul writes:
Kelson wrote:
Jason Haar wrote:
May I propose that sa-update should become merged into spamd? (or
daemonized)
Merging would be bad. There are plenty of us using methods other than 
spamd to call SpamAssassin.
I dont think anyone is using spamd to call SpamAssassin.

???

one over here ;)

--j.




oh?  Care to explain how spamd would call spamassassin? That would be a 
neat trick ;)

-Jim