On Feb 9, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Matt Kettler wrote:
Jo Rhett wrote:
Again, I have a 100% stock SA configuration.
No you don't have a 100% stock config. There are at least two
differences relevant to them message you posted:
1) you have the SARE STOCKS ruleset. LW_STOCK_SPAM4 is NOT a stock
spamassasssin rule. It's part of an add-on ruleset, not a stock SA
feature.
Why do I need a custom rule to work around an FP in the ruleset?
See above.
It's really hard not to be really annoyed with this answer. What
kind of nonsense did you think my question was?
If LW_STOCK_SPAM is a SARE RULE, then I am requesting a revision to
the SARE rule. Why on the gods green earth would you assume that I
wanted a fix in the base distribution for a SARE rule?
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
