Dave Koontz wrote: > I am sure this has been asked numerous times before, but what is the logic > in having auto expiry on the bayes DB, and not seen? Seems that once tokens > have been removed from the DB there is little to no use for 'unlearning' any > associated messages. Besides on a busy system, this seen file gets large > very fast. I'd vote for auto expiry and maintenance on seen as well as AWL. >
Patches welcome. Michael > > -----Original Message----- > From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 16, 2007 7:19 PM > To: spam mailling list > Subject: Re: Bayes db size.... > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 06:17:36PM -0600, Robert Nicholson wrote: >> So you're saying that right now seen isn't capped like tokens right? > > seen has no max size nor expiry features. > > -- > Randomly Selected Tagline: > "Like any French restaurant in America, it was overpriced, noisy, moody, > and would put you in mortal danger if you had an accident with anything > larger than a croissant." - Unknown about the Renault LeCar > >
