Daryl C. W. O'Shea wrote the following on 6/8/2007 2:41 PM -0800:
If you've got the current update from updates.spamassassin.org you've
got a working set of rules for URIBL_BLACK and URIBL_GREY. It turns
out that they didn't hit for Raymond either, so you won't see them in
this case.
Daryl
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
Well, right now I'm running these commands to get updates:
sa-update --gpgkey <GPGKEY> --channel saupdates.openprotect.com
sa-update --gpgkey <GPGKEY> --channel updates.spamassassin.org
sa-update doesn't download URIBL_BLACK and URIBL_GREY
What am I doing wrong?
Luis
2007/6/8, Daryl C. W. O'Shea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Luis Hernán Otegui wrote:
> Hi, Raymond, I don't have any URIBL rules firing up (SA 3.2.0 from
> source here, most of the other relevant info is in the header of the
> mail I sent before to test). Where did you get them?
Run sa-update to get URIBL_BLACK and URIBL_GREY.
Daryl
For what it's worth, and maybe it's different than the issues you are
seeing, but I have been finding with SA 3.2.0, that some messages are
not firing on URIBL tests. However, if the headers of the message are
removed, the URIBL tests run fine. I posted a bug report to bugzilla
(Bug 5506). I am running SA on Fedora 7 with perl 5.8.8 and was doing
my test strictly with SA:
spamassassin -t < test.txt
I did this because I wanted to take amavisd-new out of the picture.
Also, someone mentioned Net::DNS, my version is 0.59.
Bill
