On Thursday 20 March 2008 18:25:15 SM wrote:
> At 08:44 20-03-2008, Arvid Ephraim Picciani wrote:
> >wow. i got -1.0 here. you're filtering html agressivly?
>
> That's from ASF.
what's ASF?
tests there where:
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
1.0 FUZZY_ROLEX BODY: Attempt to obfuscate words in spam
0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.1 MPART_ALT_DIFF BODY: HTML and text parts are different
0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
0.2 URIBL_GREY Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist
[URIs: orglex.com]
0.5 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag
0.0 MIME_HTML_ONLY_MULTI Multipart message only has text/html MIME parts
> It's better to whitelist messages from an antispam list given the
> nature of the discussion.
not really. we don't say things like "free office 2008" or "VIAGRA" too
often :D
--
best regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Arvid Ephraim Picciani
