Heinrich Christian Peters wrote on Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:56:18 +0200: > But, especially > German spam-mails, are "wrongly" classified by the bayes-system.
That's normal. As Germans we got a lot of German ham, but only few German spam. So, Bayes isn't trained very well with German spam. Should > I train thees mails manually as spam, if they are not autolearned? Or > should I train *all* my spam-mails regular? You can do both. A mail already trained won't be learned again, but it won't do any harm doing that (for instance if it is easier to train all spam instead of picking the spam that was not autolearned), it just makes the whole training process last a bit longer. If I remember right I train all spam from the MailScanner spam quarantine with a daily cron script. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
