Hello Kai, thanks for your reply.
Kai Schaetzl schrieb: > Heinrich Christian Peters wrote on Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:56:18 +0200: > >> Should I train thees mails manually as spam, if they are not >> autolearned? Or should I train *all* my spam-mails regular? > > You can do both. A mail already trained won't be learned again, but it > won't do any harm doing that (for instance if it is easier to train all > spam instead of picking the spam that was not autolearned), it just makes > the whole training process last a bit longer. OK, that is good. Perhaps I will train all spam-mails with a score higher 6 (1 more for being a spam-mail) and BAYES_00 - BAYES_50 automatically. I think training *all* mails isn't the /right/ way... > If I remember right I train all spam from the MailScanner spam quarantine > with a daily cron script. > > Kai > Heiner
