> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 4 December 2008 3:39 p.m. > To: users@spamassassin.apache.org > Subject: Re: bohunu > > On Wednesday 03 December 2008 7:01 pm, Michael Hutchinson wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > I was using Pyzor until about 2 months ago. It was quite good then, I > > don't think I ever got a False Positive with it, and it did stop a lot > > of Spam - not as much as Razor, but still significant. I had to take it > > offline as I was getting timeouts doing E-Mail scanning. I have not > > tried the new version yet - I badly want to, but our Mail server sits on > > Debian Sarge, and there is no way I can run the Binary of Bohuno as it > > requires a version of SSL I cannot use in Sarge. > > Hopefully someone can try it on a more recent distro, and provide some > > information as to whether it is any good or not. > > > > Cheers, > > Mike > > The old Pyzor is still working at least for me: > > X-Spam-Pyzor: Reported 20 times. > > Are you using this in your 'servers' file > > 82.94.255.100:24441 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ pyzor ping > 82.94.255.100:24441 (200, 'OK') >
Yes, and that all works fine. I think the problem was more to do with how many times we were doing lookups per [segment of time]. Disabling it and re-enabling it later would allow it to work again, but then timeouts would set in later in the day - Bohuno sounds like it may solve this problem by downloading a database of message digests regularly, instead of doing a network lookup for every E-Mail that is checked. This is exactly what I wanted to do with Pyzor anyway, now with Bohuno it's just a matter of when management will let me upgrade the server. Cheers, Mike
