On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:54:26 -0500 "McDonald, Dan" <dan.mcdon...@austinenergy.com> wrote:
> I've got a false-positive against TVD_PH_REC. The text in part says: > THIS REPORT MAY NOT REFLECT > THE INFORMATION REGARDING YOUR ACCOUNT FOUND ON THE OFFICIAL RECORDS > OF > > Rather than fiddle with TVD_PH_REC, I'd like to whitelist this sender > using SPF. However, it appears that the envelope from address does > not have an SPF policy; however, the helo record does match: > > X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.46 tag=-99 tag2=4.5 kill=6.31 > tests=[L_P0F_UNKN=0.8, RELAY_US=0.01, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, > SUBJ_ALL_CAPS=1, TVD_PH_REC=2.996, UPPERCASE_50_75=0.49, > US_DOLLARS_3=1.165] > > If I add a whitelist_from_spf record for this correspondent, will it > work? I don't believe so. You might try whitelist_from_rcvd if you have reverse dns on the last-hop. I'd also suggest turning on BAYES, if you want to avoid more FPs.
