> > On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:54:26 -0500 > > "McDonald, Dan" <dan.mcdon...@austinenergy.com> wrote: > > > Rather than fiddle with TVD_PH_REC, I'd like to whitelist this sender > > > using SPF. However, it appears that the envelope from address does > > > not have an SPF policy; however, the helo record does match: > > > > > > If I add a whitelist_from_spf record for this correspondent, will it > > > work?
> On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:38 +0000, RW wrote: > > I don't believe so. You might try whitelist_from_rcvd if you have > > reverse dns on the last-hop. On 16.03.09 13:50, McDonald, Dan wrote: > Unfortunately, it is sent from a large pool of servers, so > whitelist_from_rcvd is not a very good choice. The company in question > has two /16's in the SPF record for their bare domain name. do those hosts have too much of hostnames? whitelist_from_rcvd understands domain component, e.g. yahoo.com. > I've sent an e-mail off to hostmas...@... to ask them to add the SPF > record for this particular subdomain. good. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. - Have you got anything without Spam in it? - Well, there's Spam egg sausage and Spam, that's not got much Spam in it.
