Adam Stephens wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 12-May-2009, at 18:27, John Hardin wrote:
uri URI_HIDDEN /\/\../
Ah, that's very very nice.
Scoring it at 3.0, too aggressive?
I'd say so - I'm seeing lots of FPs on this, most prominently on mail
from mail.elsevier-alerts.com
I believe if the rule is strict enough such that it doesn't FP, then a
score of 3 is not inappropriate. The problem with the rule as it stands
above is that it appears to be hitting on something other than /. in a URI
I saw a FP on this today also that I don't quite understand. I searched
the text of the email and no matches against the string "\." were found
(most likely as the encoding was quoted-printable) and manually checking
the URIs didn't help much either. I'm not sure what's causing it to FP.
In the meantime I' going to revert to something closer to my original
implementation which doesn't FP on the examples I have:
uri URI_HIDDEN /\w/\.\w/
