John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 15 May 2009, Adam Stephens wrote:
LuKreme wrote:
On 12-May-2009, at 18:27, John Hardin wrote:
> uri URI_HIDDEN /\/\../
Ah, that's very very nice.
Scoring it at 3.0, too aggressive?
I'd say so - I'm seeing lots of FPs on this, most prominently on mail
from mail.elsevier-alerts.com
Really? Sites are sending out legitimate URLs pointing to hidden
directories?
Could you post an example, please? This I gotta see...
I don't so much think it's a case of them containing hidden dirs, but
rather for some reason the rule misfires (maybe??).
Anyway, here's an example I saw today where I can't see why the rule fired:
http://pastebin.com/m1268fbe6
