On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 11:25 +0200, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> There are new versions out that hit this rule and it should not. [...]

> If anyone wants to file a bug go ahead. I wont since people seem to like 
> loosing regular mail, lets leave it in.

Awesome attitude, thank you very much!

So there are new versions and variants. And you know about it.
Personally, I don't have any such samples. Without them, it will be
quite hard to fix the rule, don't you think?

No one wants to lose mail or have FPs. Concluding that from a comment
that the rule hits properly for one user is just wrong.


Using SA is OK. Contributing back by filing issues and providing samples
isn't for you. Yeah, that's the way to go!

  guenther


-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}

Reply via email to