On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 14:43 +0200, Raymond Dijkxhoorn wrote:
> > Sorry for the ranting. I didn't mean to insult Raymond or anyone else
> > knowing the problem but not providing samples.
>
> I didnt take it up as a insult or anything. I just confirmed this is a
> generic issue, next time i'll be silent, no problem at all.
Nah, just trying to phrase it differently than "I got the evidence right
here, but I'll keep it to myself" would be good. ;-) Helpful comments
and confirmation, on-list or in bugzilla, are always appreciated.
> But personally i think the SA corpus should be worked on. Its getting less
> wide then it was used to be. The mass checks dont take place on the Ninja
> list either since most of the mass checkers are offline.
Agreed. But that requires volunteers and hand-classified corpora. As
I've said before, I will eventually join it when I got my infrastructure
sorted.
> > The very wording and statement, that what was written, not implied,
> > triggered the community guy in me spending lots of time supporting and
> Thats the problem with e-mail. ;)
Oh, and a single comment by one list subscriber doesn't necessarily
represent the opinion of the devs or the community. ;)
Anyway, most of us agree there's something to fix. I seem to recall
quite a few changes have been committed already. Alas, also IIRC, only
to trunk since the changes are pretty huge.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu...@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
