> > On Wed, June 24, 2009 13:59, Per Jessen wrote:
> >> Blacklisting a large and serious hosting provider is just not serious
> >> and very bad for business.

> Benny Pedersen wrote:
> > http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=yahoo.com
> > http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=hotmail.com
> > http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=gmail.com
> > http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=aol.com
> > http://rfc-ignorant.org/tools/lookup.php?domain=live.com
> > 
> > you think WE block them ?, no thay block them self
> > and users that use such domains dont know

On 24.06.09 19:00, Per Jessen wrote:
> 1) I dunno who 'WE' are in this context. Please enlighten me.
> 2) I didn't include free email providers in my list of "large and
> serious hosting providers" - I was thinking more of organisations such
> as 1and1, hetzner, rackspace etc. etc. 
> 3) I wouldn't refer to rfc-ignorant as a blacklist - nobody with half a
> brain would block email just because of RFC ignorance on the part of
> the sender.

Why not? I do that and intentionally - I don't like receiving spam from
companies that don't accept complaints...

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I intend to live forever - so far so good. 

Reply via email to