On 7/3/2009 12:32 PM, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 11:26 +0100, Mike Cardwell wrote:
Aaron Wolfe wrote:

I think the point was that the URIBL's are never going to be listing
these domains, so why waste time looking them up
m...@haven:~$ host constantcontact.com.multi.uribl.com
constantcontact.com.multi.uribl.com     A       127.0.0.4
m...@haven:~$

Oh Dear - that kind of rains on the parade of the 'legacy' argument and
puts the ball into the SA court.

not really - the implemented score in SA is so low that it won't do much. Other apps may treat it differently.

I also get that;

;; ANSWER SECTION:
constantcontact.com.multi.uribl.com. 1800 IN A  127.0.0.4

Seems like the cynical who make 'silly assumptions' may not be as silly
as we first thought. There name came up when I was at Barracuda. AFAIR
they were white listed on the Barracuda White List. No amount of
customer complaints seemed to change that either....


grey.uribl.com - This lists contains domains found in UBE/UCE, and possibly honour opt-out requests. It may include ESPs which allow customers to import their recipient lists and may have no control over the subscription methods. This list can and probably will cause False Positives depending on your definition of UBE/UCE. This zone rebuilds several times a day as necessary.

It still doesn't change the fact that not everyone has "the feeling" ContantContact sends UBE/UCE

I'm leaving my personal opinion out of the game.

Reply via email to