rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote:
m...@haven:~$ host constantcontact.com.multi.uribl.com
constantcontact.com.multi.uribl.com A 127.0.0.4
m...@haven:~$
Oh Dear - that kind of rains on the parade of the 'legacy' argument and
puts the ball into the SA court.
Actually, it gives strength to the "legacy" argument, and the ball wass
allready in the SA court.
(You do know what "legacy" means, right?)
constantcontact.com.multi.uribl.com. 1800 IN A 127.0.0.4
Seems like the cynical who make 'silly assumptions' may not be as silly
as we first thought.
Seems like you think missing a score of 0.25 would be worth money to
someone. I think that's pretty silly.
Calling it whitelisting also seems silly.
I do think that the skipping of CC should be reviewed though. It might
be listed in other URIDNSBLs for example.
If the main purpose of the default list of domains to skip URIDNSBL
checks for is to save resources by not checking domains that won't be
hit anyway, then the whole list should probably be regularly checked by
a script that simply flags any domains present on URIDNSBLs for review
(or possibly just comment them out of the list).
/Jonas
--
Jonas Eckerman
Fruktträdet & Förbundet Sveriges Dövblinda
http://www.fsdb.org/
http://www.frukt.org/
http://whatever.frukt.org/
