Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: > Hi SAs, > > Well, after reading this link > http://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/sa-learn.html I'm still looking > for an easy-way to let my mortal users to train our antispam. I was thinking > a mailbox such as h...@antispamserver and s...@antispamserver to let users > to > forward their false positivos or their false netgatives. In isde each box > (ham or spam), of course a procmail with sa-learn input will be forwarded. > > My doubts are nexts: > 1. Will forwarded mails be usefull for training, I mean if spam was: From: > spa...@example.net To: u...@mydomain, when forwarding it will be From: > mu...@mydomain To: s...@antispamserver. Change of this and forwarding > (getting rid of headers because mail-clients) wont change learning? > Forwarded mails are NOT useful.
You also neglected to mention the change of Received headers, and pretty much every header in the message, the re-encoding of the body by your mail client, etc. Since SA's bayes tokenizes headers, that's disastrous. > 2. If technique in question 1 is usless, what other way would be nice to let > user to report a false positive/negative for training. In some cases you can have the client forward as attachment, and use a mailbox that strips attachments and feeds them to sa-learn. As long as the client being used forwards the entire original message, with complete headers, this should work fine. > > > TIA > > LD > > >
