Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz wrote: > Le lundi 10 août 2009 19:15:15, Cedric Knight a écrit : >> Stefan wrote: [...] >>> You have to forward the message as an attachment un unpack it after >>> receiving. Have a look at: >>> https://po2.uni-stuttgart.de/~rusjako/sal-wrapper >> Yes, I find this approach works well. It's the simplest way for me to >> train Bayes, and most users can cope with it, providing they're not >> using Outlook 2003/XP which can't forward as an attachment. But >> Thunderbird, Outlook Express, Squirrelmail and Pine all can easily. >> It's not as simple as a 'This Is Spam' button perhaps, and that's a >> *good* thing. Requiring a little bit of thought stops people using it >> as an alternative to the delete key for 'OK, perhaps I did subscribe to >> this but I don't want it now'. [...]
> Yes but problem is that 99% of users are about using some kind of outlook Well then, tell them not to :) Outlook Express and Windows Mail are fine. Outlook 2003 supposedly needs a special program like http://www.olspamcop.org/ to forward properly, although if you select multiple messages to forward, then it will forward them in some kind of possibly useful digest format. Outlook 2007 introduces an explicit menu item called "forward as an attachment" (Ctrl+Alt+F) but still mangles the headers: http://forum.spamcop.net/forums/index.php?showtopic=10241&st=0&p=70453&#entry70453 Outlook 2007 also mangles the headers (kind of reconstructing a misleading semblance of what the original was) when moving between IMAP folders. Therefore, I wouldn't use spamassassin -r on spam from Outlook users, but sa-learn to get tokens from the body text may be OK. Actually, some users of Outlook 2003 do seem to be able to forward as intact message/rfc822 attachment. Not exactly sure how. Anyway, the 1% using a better e-mail program may be all that's needed to train Bayes. CK
