On söndagen den 2 augusti 2009, RW wrote: > On Sat, 1 Aug 2009 21:34:04 -0400 > > "Terry Carmen" <te...@cnysupport.com> wrote: > > > Of course it's blacklisted, but would you care to explain how > > > rejecting mail from 59.184.51.13 helps, when the backscatter > > > doesn't come from there? > > > > According to the OP, that's the IP he received the message from. > > No, he quoted the following: > > Received-From-MTA: dns;triband-mum-59.184.51.13.mtnl.net.in > > as I already said: "Received-From-MTA is a standard DSN field set by > the MTA generating the DSN."
So it might perhaps be worthwhile to extract that field and test it against
some RBLs?
--
Magnus Holmgren holmg...@lysator.liu.se
(No Cc of list mail needed, thanks)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
