> I was somewhat surprised that this failed to score;
>
> http://pastebin.com/m4c75e3ac
>
> Log excerpt;
> Sat Sep 12 05:08:57 2009 [7319] info: spamd: result: . 0 -
> HTML_MESSAGE,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
> scantime=0.3,size=5400,required_score=5.0,rhost=localhost,raddr=127.0.0.1,rport=55111,mid=<00fada512664885bffba277008395...@aim.com>,autolearn=disabled
>
> Did this miss - or just missfire?
Content analysis details: (17.0 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
5.0 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
[score: 0.9996]
1.2 TO_MALFORMED To: has a malformed address
0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
4.0 BOTNET Relay might be a spambot or virusbot
[botnet0.8,ip=87.208.178.204,rdns=ip204-178-208-87.adsl2.static.versatel.nl,maildomain=aim.com,client,ipinhostname,clientwords]
0.6 SPF_HELO_NEUTRAL SPF: HELO does not match SPF record (neutral)
1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
0.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/)
1.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_E4_51_100 Razor2 gives engine 4 confidence level
above 50%
[cf: 100]
0.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 Razor2 gives confidence level above 50%
[cf: 100]
2.2 DCC_CHECK Listed in DCC (http://rhyolite.com/anti-spam/dcc/)
1.0 DIGEST_MULTIPLE Message hits more than one network digest check
3.0 JM_SOUGHT_FRAUD_3 Body contains frequently-spammed text patterns
-4.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
