On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 14:06 +0100, RW wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:56:27 +0100
> Clunk Werclick <mailbacku...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
{trimmed down to the relevant point you make}
> Adding irrelevant text to a spam may make it less likely likely to be
> caught,
Thank you. So if your bayes 'good' tokens that happen to catch on this
'irrelevant' text, the result of having the bayes is near pointless. For
example, something like this:
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
C Werclick .Lot
Technical incompetent
Loyal Order Of The Teapot.
This e-mail and its attachments is intended only to be used as an e-mail
and an attachment. Any use of it for other purposes other than as an
e-mail and an attachment will not be covered by any warranty that may or
may not form part of this e-mail and attachment.
