On 12-Sep-2009, at 10:27, Clunk Werclick wrote:
I disagree. It can do as much harm as good. My own view and
observation
from the past have rendered it pointless in my context. It adds
latency,
is easily poisoned and rarely makes much difference to the score. I do
appreciate some people like it, but my own view is spam has moved on
beyond the point of it being useful.
Facts? we don't need no pesky facts. You are very misinformed.
No thanks, I'll pass on that. In this specific case it still would not
have increased the score to a point where the clock cycles made it
worth
it.
The Bayes score ALONE would have pushed this over the spam threshold
on my machine.
--
Take my hand and I'll show you what was and will be.
