Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar <at> fantomas.sk> writes: > You haven't read Matt's explanation of why it wasn't a good idea, did you? > > There are rules with negative scores, which can puch the score back to the > ham, e.g. whitelist. Would you like to stop scoring before e.g. whitelist is > checked?
I am not going to postpone the execution of the negative score rules.
