On Sat, 21 Nov 2009, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 15:20 -0800, Mark Hedges wrote: > > As I've already confirmed by including the debugging log > > attachment in my first message, the test rule is loaded, > > > When run under sendmail and procmail as well?
The debug log that I sent the first time was the output when running spamc from .procmailrc. During message scan: Fri Nov 20 11:49:32 2009 [26661] dbg: dns: checking RBL spammers.rbl.dmz., set cov_spammers It's apparently aware of the rule, so I don't understand why the rule is not running. > I might have missed something, but saw that you confirmed > the test was loaded and called in your test rig but not > that this was necessarily true in the other two cases. > > > And, it doesn't explain why the rule is correctly > > loaded, but not run when scanned, and is run when I put > > the message through the command line. > > > That's often a mark of location dependency, hence my > comment. Is it possible that the sendmail wrapper and/or > the procmail environment are overriding the siteconfig > path? Does your site use spamc/spamd in some places and > spamassassin in others? We always use spamc from .procmailrc. I used `spamassassin` for the test recommended earlier by Benny Pedersen. `spamassassin` works, but `spamc` does not work. I verified that spamd is starting with the same siteconfigpath in both `spamd` and `spamassassin`, by adding a special header only in that cf file. So, `spamc` is talking to the correct spamd. spamd is running like this: spamd --max-conn-per-child=15 --timeout-child=1200 --daemonize --nouser-config --sql-config --username=defang --listen-ip=192.168.6.100 --allowed-ips=192.168.0.0/16 --debug --max-children=8 --port=793 --siteconfigpath=/etc/mail/spamassassin/digicine/ --helper-home-dir=/var/cache/spamassassin/digicine --syslog=/var/log/spamassassin/digicine.log --pidfile=/var/run/spamassassin/spamd-digicine.pid That's the same siteconfigpath that I used with `spamassassin`. The helper home dir is writeable by the process user. It does not matter if I run with --paranoid or not. I also added a header that prints _RELAYSUNTRUSTED_ for info. The relay I'm trying to block appears in both instances. _SUBTESTS(,)_ is also the same in both instances. I am at the point of adding more debugging statements to the source code. Thanks very much for your help! Mark
