Am 30.01.2010 16:48, schrieb Jeff Mincy:
>    From: K�rlis Repsons <karlis.reps...@gmail.com>
>    Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2010 14:07:16 +0000
>    
>    On Saturday 30 January 2010 13:54:14 Jeff Mincy wrote:
>    > Retrain the message correctly in Bayes.  Bayes will catch on to this
>    > after a few times.  The subject alone should be a strong enough clue
>    > for bayes (I get BAYES_80 on this partial sample), so it looks like
>    > you are doing only autolearn and not correcting messages that were
>    > learned incorrectly.
>    > -jeff
>    
> I couldn't figure out how to get an unadulterated version of the
> message from the spamalyser.com link you posted in a previous message.
> I tried this
>  wget -O - -q http://spamalyser.com/v/5cbffujq/original.txt
> pastebin has a simple way to download the original.
> Anyway, I eventually got something.
> 
>    Hmm, well, I just started with SA, so my filters aren't much trained yet. 
>    The thing is, I didn't believe its the Bayes filter to be used for that 
> case! 
> 
> Bayes is an incredible tool, but only if you let it.  The worst thing
> you can do to bayes is mistrain it by learning spam messages has ham.
> The other bad thing is to limit the number of messages that it learns from.
> 
>    Because I still think, that its not correct to train SA filter on that 
> letter 
>    as spam! It can contain words, which simply should not contribute to be 
> more 
>    "spam", no? Thats not a problem?
> 
> No, that is not a problem.
> Yes, spam contains words, some of those words will also occur in ham.
> Bayes will figure out which words are spammy and which are hammy and
> which occur in both.
> 
> First start with training Bayes and then check if DCC and network
> tests are enabled.
> 
> Anyway, I get the following.   
>    
> BAYES_99,DCC_CHECK,RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_FIVETEN_SPAM,RCVD_IN_NIXSPAM,RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT1,RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT2,RCVD_IN_UCEPROTECT3,BOTNET,BOTNET_BADDNS
> 
> Botnet/FIVETEN/NIXSPAM/UCEPROTECT are additional rules added.
> 
> -jeff
> 

in the "Raw Message" tab you can get the plain message
(http://spamalyser.com/v/5cbffujq/raw)

Reply via email to