On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:39:43 +0100 "Rob Sterenborg" <r.sterenb...@netsourcing.nl> wrote:
> On 2010-02-24, Kai Schaetzl wrote: > > > > Postfix: I would have two different smtpd daemons - one for > > > You don't have to run two postfixes for this. > > I think Per means: 2 smtpd processes, not 2 Postfixes.. > > > -- > Rob > Humour me. Does this not mean a need to change the outbound to either a different IP or port? I guess you could start hashing things around with IPTables to redirect certain requests, but once you've done all of this, changed all the clients etc. etc, you are saying this would be *easier* than SPF? Sure, I get the sentiment but I don't necessarily agree that large changes would be better than making use of a simple DNS based mechanism that already exists. Factor in the millions of email users who don't use Postfix and run things like Exchange and things tend to widen up.
